RRx-001 followed by platinum plus etoposide in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer.
By: Daniel Morgensztern, Michal Rose, Saiama N Waqar, John Morris, Patrick C Ma, Thomas Reid, Christina E Brzezniak, Karen G Zeman, Arvinda Padmanabhan, JoAnn Hirth, Alexander I Spira, Jane B Trepel, Sukhmani K Padda

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. danielmorgensztern@wustl.edu.
2019-02-02; doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0504-8
Abstract

Background

This exploratory single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of RRx-001 followed by reintroduction of platinum plus etoposide in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

Patients were treated with RRx-001 4 mg IV on day 1 of each week of a 21-day cycle followed at progression by re-challenge with etoposide 80-100 IV mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 and cisplatin 60-80 mg/m2 IV on day 1 or carboplatin AUC 5-6 IV on day 1, every 21 days. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate to platinum regimen.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enroled and received at least one dose of RRx-001. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-9) and 19 (73.1%) patients had platinum-resistant disease. In the intention-to-treat population, one patient (3.8%) had complete response and six (23.1%) had partial response on platinum plus etoposide. The estimated median and 12-month OS from enrolment were 8.6 months and 44.1%, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event from RRx-001 was mild discomfort at the infusion site (23%).

Conclusions

RRx-001 followed by re-challenge with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy is feasible and associated with promising results.

Clinical

NCT02489903.





PMID:31231122






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements