Machine Learning Algorithm Identifies Patients at High Risk for Early Complications After Intracranial Tumor Surgery: Registry-Based Cohort Study.
By: Christiaan H B van Niftrik, Frank van der Wouden, Victor E Staartjes, Jorn Fierstra, Martin N Stienen, Kevin Akeret, Martina Sebök, Tommaso Fedele, Johannes Sarnthein, Oliver Bozinov, Niklaus Krayenbühl, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
2018-08-21; doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz145
Abstract

Introduction

Reliable preoperative identification of patients at high risk for early postoperative complications occurring within 24 h (EPC) of intracranial tumor surgery can improve patient safety and postoperative management. Statistical analysis using machine learning algorithms may generate models that predict EPC better than conventional statistical methods.

Objective

To train such a model and to assess its predictive ability.

Methods

This cohort study included patients from an ongoing prospective patient registry at a single tertiary care center with an intracranial tumor that underwent elective neurosurgery between June 2015 and May 2017. EPC were categorized based on the Clavien-Dindo classification score. Conventional statistical methods and different machine learning algorithms were used to predict EPC using preoperatively available patient, clinical, and surgery-related variables. The performance of each model was derived from examining classification performance metrics on an out-of-sample test dataset.

Results

EPC occurred in 174 (26%) of 668 patients included in the analysis. Gradient boosting machine learning algorithms provided the model best predicting the probability of an EPC. The model scored an accuracy of 0.70 (confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.79) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (CI 0.58-0.91) and 0.67 (CI 0.53-0.77) on the test set. The conventional statistical model showed inferior predictive power (test set: accuracy: 0.59 (CI 0.47-0.71); AUC: 0.64; sensitivity: 0.76 (CI 0.64-0.85); specificity: 0.53 (CI 0.41-0.64)).

Conclusion

Using gradient boosting machine learning algorithms, it was possible to create a prediction model superior to conventional statistical methods. While conventional statistical methods favor patients' characteristics, we found the pathology and surgery-related (histology, anatomical localization, surgical access) variables to be better predictors of EPC.



Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

PMID:31149726






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements