Serial Molecular Profiling of Low-grade Prostate Cancer to Assess Tumor Upgrading: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
By: Simpa S Salami, Jeffrey J Tosoian, Srinivas Nallandhighal, Tonye A Jones, Scott Brockman, Fuad F Elkhoury, Selena Bazzi, Komal R Plouffe, Javed Siddiqui, Chia-Jen Liu, Lakshmi P Kunju, Todd M Morgan, Shyam Natarajan, Philip S Boonstra, Lauren Sumida, Scott A Tomlins, Aaron M Udager, Anthony E Sisk, Leonard S Marks, Ganesh S Palapattu

Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: simpa@med.umich.edu.
2019-12-30; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.041
Abstract

Background

The potential for low-grade (grade group 1 [GG1]) prostate cancer (PCa) to progress to high-grade disease remains unclear.

Objective

To interrogate the molecular and biological features of low-grade PCa serially over time.

Design,

Nested longitudinal cohort study in an academic active surveillance (AS) program. Men were on AS for GG1 PCa from 2012 to 2017.

Intervention

Electronic tracking and resampling of PCa using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy.

Outcome

ERG immunohistochemistry (IHC) and targeted DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing were performed on initial and repeat biopsies. Tumor clonality was assessed. Molecular data were compared between men who upgraded and those who did not upgrade to GG ≥ 2 cancer.

Results

Sixty-six men with median age 64 yr (interquartile range [IQR], 59-69) and prostate-specific antigen 4.9 ng/mL (IQR, 3.3-6.4) underwent repeat sampling of a tracked tumor focus (median interval, 11 mo; IQR, 6-13). IHC-based ERG fusion status was concordant at initial and repeat biopsies in 63 men (95% vs expected 50%, p <  0.001), and RNAseq-based fusion and isoform expression were concordant in nine of 13 (69%) ERG+ patients, supporting focal resampling. Among 15 men who upgraded with complete data at both time points, integrated DNA/RNAseq analysis provided evidence of shared clonality in at least five cases. Such cases could reflect initial undersampling, but also support the possibility of clonal temporal progression of low-grade cancer. Our assessment was limited by sample size and use of targeted sequencing.

Conclusions

Repeat molecular assessment of low-grade tumors suggests that clonal progression could be one mechanism of upgrading. These data underscore the importance of serial tumor assessment in men pursuing AS of low-grade PCa.

Patient

We performed targeted rebiopsy and molecular testing of low-grade tumors on active surveillance. Our findings highlight the importance of periodic biopsy as a component of monitoring for cancer upgrading during surveillance.



Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PMID:32631746






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements