Prognostic and clinical impact of PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression in a cohort of 437 oesophageal cancers.
By: Kazuo Okadome, Yoshifumi Baba, Daichi Nomoto, Taisuke Yagi, Rebecca Kalikawe, Kazuto Harada, Yukiharu Hiyoshi, Yohei Nagai, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Shiro Iwagami, Yuji Miyamoto, Naoya Yoshida, Masayuki Watanabe, Yoshihiro Komohara, Takashi Shono, Yutaka Sasaki, Hideo Baba

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
2019-10-28; doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0811-0
Abstract

Background

The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays critical roles in tumour immunology, and serves as an immune-based therapeutic target. Less is known regarding PD-L2, another ligand of PD-1, and its relation to clinical outcome in human cancers.

Methods

We used a database of 437 surgically and 100 endoscopically resected oesophageal cancers (squamous cell carcinoma, n = 483; adenocarcinoma, n = 36; others, n = 18) to evaluate PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Compared with PD-L2-negative cases (n = 366, 83.8%), PD-L2-positive cases (n = 71, 16.2%) had worse overall survival (P = 0.011, log-rank test). There was not a significant correlation between PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression. Multiplex immunofluorescence revealed that there was variability in the expression pattern of PD-L2 and PD-L1. In early-stage tumours, PD-L2 expression was more frequently observed compared with PD-L1.

Conclusions

PD-L2 as well as PD-L1 were associated with an unfavourable prognosis in oesophageal cancer, supporting the role of PD-L2 as a prognostic biomarker. Considering that PD-L2 and PD-L1 had different features in terms of expression timing and responses to chemotherapeutic drugs, evaluation of both PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression may be clinically important.





PMID:32210369






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements