An comparison of acute toxicities and patient-reported outcomes between intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy after ipsilateral radiation for head and neck cancers.
By: Elizabeth B Jeans, Satomi Shiraishi, Gohar Manzar, Lindsay K Morris, Adam Amundson, Lisa A McGee, Jean-Claude Rwigema, Michelle Neben-Wittich, David M Routman, Daniel J Ma, Samir H Patel, Robert L Foote, Scott C Lester

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
2021-10-27; doi: 10.1002/hed.26937
Abstract

Background

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) demonstrates superior dose distribution over volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for sparing organs-at-risk (OARs) in ipsilateral radiotherapy. To determine a clinical benefit, assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and physician-reported toxicities alongside a dosimetric analysis is needed.

Methods

Plans were analyzed for dosimetric differences. PROs were compared for patients undergoing ipsilateral curative-intent radiotherapy for tonsil and salivary gland cancers with VMAT or IMPT from 2015 to 2020. Physician-reported toxicities were compared.

Results

In 40 patients, IMPT was associated with decreased dose to multiple OARs and less deterioration in the following PROs: pain, swallowing function, dry mouth, sticky saliva, sensory change, cough, speech, feeling ill, and social eating. Physician-reported toxicities demonstrated less oral pain.

Conclusion

IMPT is associated with decreased dose to OARs and less patient-reported acute deterioration in multiple head and neck domains. A strong consideration for IMPT in ipsilateral head and neck patients with cancer is warranted.



© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

PMID:34859516






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements