Novel cyclic C5-curcuminoids possess anticancer activities against HeLa cervix carcinoma, HEC-1A adenocarcinoma, and T24 bladder carcinoma cells
By: Pandur, Edina, Schenk, Petra, Kulcsár, Győző, Gulyás-Fekete, Gergely, Sipos, Katalin, Huber, Imre

BioMed Central
2025-12-03; doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-04077-2

Abstract

Background

Umin was discovered in Curcuma longa L. and/or Curcuma domestica L. C5-curcumin and its derivatives, like synthetic cyclic C5-curcuminoids, are promising anticancer compounds with exceptional pharmacokinetic profiles compared to curcumin.

Methods

To demonstrate their anticancer activities, we tested six novel synthetic cyclic C5-curcuminoids on HeLa, HEC-1A, and T24 tumor cell lines. This investigation focused on ferroptosis and apoptosis, two types of programmed cell death. Ferroptosis-related genes were investigated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western blotting. The total iron content, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, glutathione peroxidase activity, and thiol concentrations were measured to determine ferroptosis. Cytochrome c levels and caspase-3 activity were measured to monitor the apoptosis.

Results

The study of six synthetic cyclic C5-curcuminoids revealed that their effects on HeLa cells differed from those on HEC-1A and T24 cells, indicating distinct mechanisms of action. Compound 4 notably increased iron accumulation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, while decreasing antioxidant defenses in all three carcinoma cell lines, suggesting a ferroptotic response. In contrast, compound 9 was successful in activating caspase-3 in carcinoma cells and inducing apoptosis in the COS-1 control cell line. Notably, compound 4 did not enhance caspase-3 activity in the control cell line. These results highlight compound 4 as a possible synthetic cyclic C5-curcuminoid for the three cancerous cell lines tested.

Conclusion

Regarding the distinct effects of the examined synthetic cyclic C5-curcuminoids on the three cancer cell types, we hypothesize that their mechanisms of action are different and that divergent target molecules and/or signaling pathways may be involved. However, compounds 4 and 9 were efficient against the three carcinoma cell lines. Further examination of the possible targets could help elucidate which compounds are more suitable for consideration as potential antitumor drug candidates.







Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements