Impact of a tailored oral vitamin D supplementation regimen on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early breast cancer patients: a randomized phase III study.
By: W Jacot, N Firmin, L Roca, D Topart, S Gallet, A Durigova, S Mirr, L Abach, S Pouderoux, V D'Hondt, J P Bleuse, P J Lamy, G Romieu

Medical oncology Department - Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France William.Jacot@icm.unicancer.fr.
2016-4-1; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw145
Abstract

Background

A minority of early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have sufficient baseline vitamin D (vitD) level. This randomized phase III study assessed the safety and efficacy of a tailored, high-dose, oral vitD supplementation in restoring a normal 25-hydroxy vitD (25OHD) level in this population.

Patients

Participants received a 6-month conventional (C) vitD and calcium supplementation or a 6-month high-dose oral vitD regimen tailored on the deficiency (T) and a conventional calcium supplementation. The primary endpoint was the 6-month percentage of 25OHD serum level normalization.

Results

215 patients including 197 patients with vitD deficiency were recruited, and 195 patients were randomized (T, 100; C, 95). Compliance to the daily oral supplementation was 68.4% and 67% in the C and T arms, respectively. Discontinuous high-dose vitD compliance appeared higher in the T arm (77%). At 6 months, more patients presented with a normalized vitD level in the T arm (30% vs. 12.6%; p=0.003). Supplementation was well tolerated, and no significant difference in the treatment-related toxicity between the 2 arms was reported. 52 patients without vitD normalization from the C arm switched to the T arm after 6 months. At 12 months, 44% of these patients achieved vitD normalization.

Conclusion

A tailored high-dose oral vitD supplementation safely allows a higher percentage of the serum 25OHD level normalization compared with a conventional regimen in chemotherapy-treated EBC patients. As compliance to a daily oral supplementation remains poor in this setting, an adaptation of the treatment schedule is warranted.



© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PMID:27029707






Copyright 2026 InterMDnet | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements